In a significant legal setback for former U.S. President Donald Trump, a U.S. appeals court has rejected his emergency bid to limit birthright citizenship. This decision reinforces the constitutional provision granting automatic citizenship to individuals born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.
Trump’s Challenge to Birthright Citizenship
Trump has long opposed birthright citizenship, arguing that it encourages illegal immigration and places a financial burden on the country. His legal team attempted to challenge this fundamental right, which is protected under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the appeals court ruled against his emergency bid, reaffirming that birthright citizenship remains intact.
The Legal Basis for the Court’s Decision
The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Courts have consistently upheld this interpretation, rejecting efforts to limit citizenship rights based on the immigration status of parents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c20d3/c20d3198f626866b0d41708748fb6a3488dd39ef" alt="US Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Emergency Bid to Curtail Birthright Citizenship 2 US Appeals Court Rejects Trumps Emergency Bid to Curtail Birthright Citizenship NRI Affairs"
Implications of the Ruling
The ruling is seen as a major victory for immigrant communities and legal advocates who have fought to protect birthright citizenship. It also represents a setback for Trump’s broader immigration policies, which have sought to impose stricter restrictions on pathways to U.S. citizenship.
While Trump and his supporters may continue to push for changes to U.S. immigration law, the appeals court’s rejection signals that any modification to birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment rather than an executive or legislative directive.